PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.83%
Positive revenue growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
12.55%
Positive gross profit growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-10.38%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-10.38%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-79.93%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 105.02%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-81.25%
Negative EPS growth while GFI is at 104.98%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-81.25%
Negative diluted EPS growth while GFI is at 104.47%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.17%
Share reduction more than 1.5x GFI's 11.60%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.23%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x GFI's 2.89%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
1.54%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while GFI cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
0.04%
OCF growth under 50% of GFI's 33.62%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
126.84%
FCF growth above 1.5x GFI's 64.77%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
222.40%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 26.42%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-5.56%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-11.09%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
210.51%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 39.65%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-29.99%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-26.27%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
108.33%
Positive 10Y CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-94.15%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while GFI is 103.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
103.66%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to GFI's 106.50%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
254.23%
Positive growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
23.55%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
12.98%
Positive short-term equity growth while GFI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.85%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while GFI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
77.66%
Below 50% of GFI's 297.84%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
118.02%
AR growth of 118.02% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.76%
Negative asset growth while GFI invests at 0.77%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-0.46%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-8.44%
We’re deleveraging while GFI stands at 11.04%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.46%
We expand SG&A while GFI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.