95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.81%
Negative revenue growth while GFI stands at 12.34%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-23.27%
Negative gross profit growth while GFI is at 513.74%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-256.60%
Negative EBIT growth while GFI is at 173.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-256.60%
Negative operating income growth while GFI is at 173.59%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-317.43%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 283.15%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-315.38%
Negative EPS growth while GFI is at 280.80%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-315.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while GFI is at 298.01%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.31%
Slight or no buybacks while GFI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.30%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x GFI's 4.37%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.56%
Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 29.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-8.06%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 292.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
205.89%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 16.60%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
2.32%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of GFI's 2.74%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
-12.59%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI stands at 5.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
176.09%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 43.57%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-14.51%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI is at 21.92%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-20.28%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI stands at 14.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-552.06%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while GFI is at 238.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-257.57%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while GFI is 300.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-302.57%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
161.66%
Positive growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
17.18%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
3.49%
Positive short-term equity growth while GFI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.77%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while GFI is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
69.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 4.08%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-27.48%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-3.67%
Negative asset growth while GFI invests at 6.74%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.48%
We have a declining book value while GFI shows 8.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-7.41%
We’re deleveraging while GFI stands at 10.88%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.45%
We cut SG&A while GFI invests at 103.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.