95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.01%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x GFI's 13.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
42.43%
Positive gross profit growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
173.43%
EBIT growth above 1.5x GFI's 21.34%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
173.43%
Positive operating income growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
160.92%
Net income growth above 1.5x GFI's 20.26%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
160.71%
EPS growth above 1.5x GFI's 21.05%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
160.71%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x GFI's 18.75%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.23%
Share change of 0.23% while GFI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.31%
Diluted share count expanding well above GFI's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-48.78%
Dividend reduction while GFI stands at 128.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
30.24%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x GFI's 27.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
30.44%
FCF growth 50-75% of GFI's 50.03%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
124.83%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to GFI's 137.33%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
8.13%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 94.05%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-5.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI stands at 57.40%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
119.98%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 334.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-5.19%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI is at 201.20%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-13.15%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI stands at 99.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
58.76%
Below 50% of GFI's 40555.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
1255.10%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 546.34%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-9.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI is 103.80%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
121.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 54.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
15.88%
Below 50% of GFI's 109.50%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
3.35%
Below 50% of GFI's 44.58%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.92%
Below 50% of GFI's 540.54%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
66.54%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 129.03%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
156.25%
Our AR growth while GFI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.29%
Asset growth well under 50% of GFI's 7.05%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.52%
Under 50% of GFI's 16.39%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-7.47%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.56%
SG&A declining or stable vs. GFI's 70.86%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.