PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.17%
Negative revenue growth while GFI stands at 15.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
0.25%
Positive gross profit growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
3.15%
EBIT growth below 50% of GFI's 61.24%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.15%
Operating income growth under 50% of GFI's 61.24%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
2.06%
Net income growth under 50% of GFI's 29.22%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.22%
Slight or no buybacks while GFI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.23%
Slight or no buyback while GFI is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
3.61%
Dividend growth under 50% of GFI's 207.00%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-7.33%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-7.91%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 77.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
88.45%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 20.59%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
31.69%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 2.35%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-14.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI stands at 16.80%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
42.03%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of GFI's 55.67%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
16.03%
Positive OCF/share growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-25.58%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
16.64%
Positive 10Y CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
23.39%
Below 50% of GFI's 1390.49%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
603.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 100.09%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
136.18%
Positive growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
21.55%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
6.29%
Positive short-term equity growth while GFI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.38%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 118.61%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
47.34%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 22.98%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
17.16%
AR growth of 17.16% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.31%
Asset growth well under 50% of GFI's 0.70%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.16%
Under 50% of GFI's 6.91%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-13.66%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.41%
We expand SG&A while GFI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.