PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.14%
Revenue growth similar to GFI's 13.29%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
28.42%
Positive gross profit growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
30.60%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x GFI's 21.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
30.60%
Positive operating income growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
22.41%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x GFI's 20.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
23.53%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x GFI's 21.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
23.53%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x GFI's 18.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while GFI stands at 128.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
34.67%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x GFI's 27.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
35.67%
FCF growth 50-75% of GFI's 50.03%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
126.65%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to GFI's 137.33%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
61.68%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 94.05%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
26.90%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 57.40%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
135.70%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 334.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
65.00%
Below 50% of GFI's 201.20%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
45.99%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 99.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
62.55%
Below 50% of GFI's 40555.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
59.02%
Below 50% of GFI's 546.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
52.81%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of GFI's 103.80%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
125.25%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 54.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-2.02%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while GFI is at 109.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
3.78%
Below 50% of GFI's 44.58%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.93%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-3.20%
Negative asset growth while GFI invests at 7.05%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.65%
We have a declining book value while GFI shows 16.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-18.14%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.92%
We cut SG&A while GFI invests at 70.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.