95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.68%
Negative revenue growth while GFI stands at 10.43%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
0.85%
Gross profit growth under 50% of GFI's 348.26%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-6.90%
Negative EBIT growth while GFI is at 27.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.90%
Negative operating income growth while GFI is at 27.52%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
11.50%
Net income growth under 50% of GFI's 70.69%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
14.29%
EPS growth under 50% of GFI's 63.64%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of GFI's 63.64%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.19%
Share reduction more than 1.5x GFI's 2.97%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.26%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x GFI's 5.45%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.53%
Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 26.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-14.16%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 74.20%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
99.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 21.03%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
35.84%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 22.30%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
22.28%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of GFI's 26.29%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
73.19%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 18.45%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
25.11%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 44.24%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
19.89%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 90.38%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
51.85%
Below 50% of GFI's 298.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
77.41%
Below 50% of GFI's 6359.16%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
54.11%
Below 50% of GFI's 171.93%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
123.94%
Positive growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
9.22%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
6.03%
Positive short-term equity growth while GFI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
117.08%
Below 50% of GFI's 266.67%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
56.86%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 32.72%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
94433.33%
Our AR growth while GFI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
Asset growth well under 50% of GFI's 3.21%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.22%
Positive BV/share change while GFI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-10.44%
We’re deleveraging while GFI stands at 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.81%
SG&A declining or stable vs. GFI's 189.36%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.