PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.24%
Revenue growth similar to GFI's 13.29%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
8.19%
Positive gross profit growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
7.00%
EBIT growth below 50% of GFI's 21.34%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
7.00%
Positive operating income growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
3.04%
Net income growth under 50% of GFI's 20.26%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
2.86%
EPS growth under 50% of GFI's 21.05%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
2.86%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of GFI's 18.75%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while GFI stands at 128.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
11.63%
OCF growth under 50% of GFI's 27.35%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-63.01%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 50.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
60.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 137.33%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
54.95%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 94.05%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
60.21%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to GFI's 57.40%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
43.28%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 334.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
82.95%
Below 50% of GFI's 201.20%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
82.43%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of GFI's 99.42%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
4.10%
Below 50% of GFI's 40555.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
254.38%
Below 50% of GFI's 546.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
134.22%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 103.80%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
90.98%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 54.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
25.60%
Below 50% of GFI's 109.50%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
16.45%
Below 50% of GFI's 44.58%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while GFI stands at 2248.68%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.20%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-31.41%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.48%
Negative asset growth while GFI invests at 7.05%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.90%
Under 50% of GFI's 16.39%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-98.25%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.98%
SG&A declining or stable vs. GFI's 70.86%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.