PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.94%
Positive revenue growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
3.70%
Gross profit growth under 50% of GFI's 57.38%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-0.01%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.01%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
2.54%
Positive net income growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2.78%
Positive EPS growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2.78%
Positive diluted EPS growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.13%
Slight or no buybacks while GFI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.13%
Slight or no buyback while GFI is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.78%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
97.38%
Positive FCF growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
33.15%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 13.00%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
50.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to GFI's 48.27%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
53.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 34.20%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
0.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 23.43%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
56.40%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of GFI's 63.53%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
57.62%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 131.81%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-11.94%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while GFI is at 67.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
167.29%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 231.84%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-48.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI is 196.57%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
90.57%
Equity/share CAGR of 90.57% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
19.17%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of GFI's 24.13%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
11.80%
Below 50% of GFI's 30.71%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
666.81%
Dividend/share CAGR of 666.81% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
173.48%
Below 50% of GFI's 1590.94%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
57.86%
Below 50% of GFI's 401.41%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
139.98%
Our AR growth while GFI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-1.95%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.89%
Asset growth above 1.5x GFI's 0.14%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.93%
Under 50% of GFI's 7.93%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-4.69%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.08%
We expand SG&A while GFI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.