Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Negative revenue growth while GFI stands at 13.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Negative EBIT growth while GFI is at 21.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while GFI is at 21.05%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while GFI is at 18.75%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

Share change of 0.05% while GFI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.

Diluted share count expanding well above GFI's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.

Dividend reduction while GFI stands at 128.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.

Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 27.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

FCF growth 50-75% of GFI's 50.03%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.

10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 137.33%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.

5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 94.05%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.

3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 57.40%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI stands at 334.46%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Below 50% of GFI's 201.20%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.

3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of GFI's 99.42%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while GFI is at 40555.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Below 50% of GFI's 546.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.

Below 50% of GFI's 109.50%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.

Below 50% of GFI's 44.58%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.

Below 50% of GFI's 2248.68%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.

Below 50% of GFI's 540.54%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.

3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 129.03%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.

Asset growth well under 50% of GFI's 7.05%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.

Under 50% of GFI's 16.39%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.

Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.