PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.44%
Revenue growth under 50% of GFI's 11.49%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-0.52%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
3.37%
EBIT growth below 50% of GFI's 17.66%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.37%
Operating income growth under 50% of GFI's 17.66%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
116.27%
Net income growth above 1.5x GFI's 3.74%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
116.67%
EPS growth above 1.5x GFI's 2.27%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
116.67%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x GFI's 2.33%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while GFI cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-2.98%
Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 32.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-154.52%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 34.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
13.83%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to GFI's 14.64%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
5.51%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 52.35%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
39.64%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 82.22%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-6.33%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI stands at 96.80%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
9.59%
Below 50% of GFI's 49.86%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
77.68%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 154.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
58.27%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 30.66% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
2532.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 727.06%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
4117.56%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 2108.30%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
84.86%
Positive growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
24.04%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of GFI's 30.52%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
19.25%
Below 50% of GFI's 61.46%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
41.31%
Stable or rising dividend while GFI is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
147.79%
Below 50% of GFI's 347.01%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
64.03%
Below 50% of GFI's 1134.75%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
7.97%
AR growth of 7.97% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
42.63%
Inventory growth of 42.63% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
4.12%
Positive asset growth while GFI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.09%
BV/share growth above 1.5x GFI's 0.62%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-6.08%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.95%
We expand SG&A while GFI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.