PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.41%
Negative revenue growth while GFI stands at 1.07%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-9.76%
Negative gross profit growth while GFI is at 105.59%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-6.19%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.19%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-5.33%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 26.82%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-5.71%
Negative EPS growth while GFI is at 26.67%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-5.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth while GFI is at 27.27%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.14%
Slight or no buybacks while GFI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.09%
Diluted share count expanding well above GFI's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.99%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
15.97%
FCF growth similar to GFI's 16.98%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
17.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 28.09%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
48.43%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of GFI's 55.69%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
57.84%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to GFI's 58.22%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
-6.51%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI stands at 34.53%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
61.94%
Below 50% of GFI's 187.55%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
86.47%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to GFI's 83.09%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-17.41%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while GFI is at 107.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
115.73%
Below 50% of GFI's 762.40%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
218.03%
Below 50% of GFI's 605.43%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
76.72%
Positive growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
24.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x GFI's 16.53%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
23.93%
Below 50% of GFI's 53.19%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
44.13%
Dividend/share CAGR of 44.13% while GFI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
119.91%
Below 50% of GFI's 271.19%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
82.04%
Below 50% of GFI's 1199.84%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-46.31%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
61.49%
We show growth while GFI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-0.33%
Negative asset growth while GFI invests at 2.71%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.92%
Under 50% of GFI's 7.01%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-9.45%
We’re deleveraging while GFI stands at 5.48%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.46%
We cut SG&A while GFI invests at 65.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.