95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.14%
Negative revenue growth while GFI stands at 13.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-3.04%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-1.06%
Negative EBIT growth while GFI is at 21.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.06%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-32.95%
Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-32.43%
Negative EPS growth while GFI is at 21.05%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-32.43%
Negative diluted EPS growth while GFI is at 18.75%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Share change of 0.07% while GFI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.08%
Diluted share count expanding well above GFI's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while GFI stands at 128.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-21.46%
Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 27.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-60.38%
Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 50.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-18.34%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while GFI stands at 137.33%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
5.34%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 94.05%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-16.68%
Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI stands at 57.40%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-36.08%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI stands at 334.46%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
5.49%
Below 50% of GFI's 201.20%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-24.69%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI stands at 99.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-34.59%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while GFI is at 40555.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
60.03%
Below 50% of GFI's 546.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
16.20%
Below 50% of GFI's 103.80%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
65.46%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GFI's 54.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
35.36%
Below 50% of GFI's 109.50%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
28.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 44.58%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.98%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-37.75%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.15%
Asset growth well under 50% of GFI's 7.05%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.34%
Under 50% of GFI's 16.39%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-10.20%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.88%
SG&A declining or stable vs. GFI's 70.86%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.