Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Negative revenue growth while GFI stands at 13.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Negative EBIT growth while GFI is at 21.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Negative net income growth while GFI stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while GFI is at 21.05%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while GFI is at 18.75%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

Share change of 0.02% while GFI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.

Dividend reduction while GFI stands at 128.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.

Negative OCF growth while GFI is at 27.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

Negative FCF growth while GFI is at 50.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 137.33%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.

5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 94.05%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.

Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI stands at 57.40%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 334.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.

Below 50% of GFI's 201.20%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while GFI stands at 99.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Below 50% of GFI's 40555.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.

Below 50% of GFI's 546.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.

Negative 3Y CAGR while GFI is 103.80%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.

Below 50% of GFI's 109.50%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.

Below 50% of GFI's 44.58%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.

Below 50% of GFI's 2248.68%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.

Below 50% of GFI's 540.54%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.

3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of GFI's 129.03%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.

Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.

Asset growth well under 50% of GFI's 7.05%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.

We have a declining book value while GFI shows 16.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.