PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.09%
Revenue growth under 50% of GFI's 13.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.25%
Positive gross profit growth while GFI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
4.11%
EBIT growth below 50% of GFI's 21.34%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
4.11%
Positive operating income growth while GFI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
26.42%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x GFI's 20.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
25.93%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x GFI's 21.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
25.93%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x GFI's 18.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
0.05%
Share change of 0.05% while GFI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.04%
Diluted share count expanding well above GFI's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-49.72%
Dividend reduction while GFI stands at 128.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
8.76%
OCF growth under 50% of GFI's 27.35%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
20.73%
FCF growth under 50% of GFI's 50.03%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
46.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 137.33%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
35.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 94.05%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
13.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 57.40%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
66.91%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 334.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
76.04%
Below 50% of GFI's 201.20%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
25.43%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GFI's 99.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
2617.04%
Below 50% of GFI's 40555.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
100.51%
Below 50% of GFI's 546.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
13.76%
Below 50% of GFI's 103.80%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
59.30%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with GFI's 54.65%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
37.47%
Below 50% of GFI's 109.50%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
20.03%
Below 50% of GFI's 44.58%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
208.45%
Below 50% of GFI's 2248.68%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
111.38%
Below 50% of GFI's 540.54%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
21.38%
Below 50% of GFI's 129.03%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
35.90%
Our AR growth while GFI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
100.00%
We show growth while GFI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.90%
Asset growth well under 50% of GFI's 7.05%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.34%
Under 50% of GFI's 16.39%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-1.26%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.27%
SG&A declining or stable vs. GFI's 70.86%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.