PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.48%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-14.48%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
219.35%
Positive EBIT growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
219.35%
Positive operating income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
311.06%
Positive net income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
975.86%
Positive EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
975.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
835.87%
OCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 57.66%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
835.87%
FCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 72.00%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
7.47%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
7.47%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
7.47%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.39%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-24.39%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-24.39%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.57%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-6.58%
Inventory is declining while KGC stands at 24.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.06%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.07%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-148.44%
We cut SG&A while KGC invests at 28.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.