PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.81%
Negative revenue growth while KGC stands at 52.22%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-8.81%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 5.02%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-197.39%
Negative EBIT growth while KGC is at 25.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-197.39%
Negative operating income growth while KGC is at 25.27%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-197.36%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 47.37%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-198.04%
Negative EPS growth while KGC is at 75.05%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-198.04%
Negative diluted EPS growth while KGC is at 75.05%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.39%
Negative OCF growth while KGC is at 31.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-92.39%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
13.24%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 137.26%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
13.24%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 26.25%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
8.73%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.50%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. KGC's 156.13%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
7.03%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. KGC's 150.13%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
3.74%
Asset growth well under 50% of KGC's 247.39%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.49%
Under 50% of KGC's 90.90%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.49%
SG&A declining or stable vs. KGC's 75.76%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.