95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-199.50%
Negative revenue growth while KGC stands at 4.05%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-199.50%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-251.32%
Negative EBIT growth while KGC is at 135.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-251.32%
Negative operating income growth while KGC is at 135.37%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-511.39%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-511.27%
Negative EPS growth while KGC is at 101.60%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-511.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while KGC is at 101.60%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1856.19%
OCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 62.73%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
1856.19%
FCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 55.45%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-278.69%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-278.69%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-36363820.17%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.92%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31219.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC is 145.59%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while KGC shows 151.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while KGC stands at 21.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-41.90%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-33.48%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-190.08%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.