PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Positive revenue growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
100.00%
Positive gross profit growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
64.36%
Positive EBIT growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
64.36%
Positive operating income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
87.32%
Net income growth above 1.5x KGC's 51.95%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
87.33%
EPS growth above 1.5x KGC's 50.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
87.33%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x KGC's 50.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-292.20%
Negative OCF growth while KGC is at 41.90%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-292.20%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-100.00%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-100.00%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-100.00%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1164.16%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1370.88%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC is 156.58%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.08%
Negative asset growth while KGC invests at 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.75%
We have a declining book value while KGC shows 0.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
110.89%
SG&A growth well above KGC's 23.19%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.