95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.91%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-13.92%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-16.76%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-16.76%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-10.50%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-16.67%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.18%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.61%
Share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 4.06%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.64%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 4.06%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.76%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-13.76%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
156.85%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-43.56%
Negative 5Y CAGR while KGC stands at 2.86%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
90.09%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 29.60%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3232.53%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 103.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
785.71%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 83.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2933.79%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 272.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
658.94%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of KGC's 842.23%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
698.75%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
729.85%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 25.29%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1036.77%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.03%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.87%
Asset growth well under 50% of KGC's 12.30%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.31%
Under 50% of KGC's 17.64%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.62%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.