PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.05%
Negative revenue growth while KGC stands at 18.07%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.94%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 12.24%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-8.75%
Negative EBIT growth while KGC is at 3.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-8.75%
Negative operating income growth while KGC is at 3.71%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-8.35%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-9.09%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-10.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.36%
Share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 38.11%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.53%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 32.02%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.87%
Negative OCF growth while KGC is at 4.77%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-6.87%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
136.57%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
101.69%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1165.13%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 71.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1283.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 117.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3452.22%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 348.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1028.99%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 165.07%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1193.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 168.77%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1764.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 46.96%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.37%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
6.81%
Asset growth above 1.5x KGC's 2.49%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
6.28%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.67%
SG&A growth well above KGC's 12.24%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.