PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.85%
Revenue growth above 1.5x KGC's 2.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
32.57%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x KGC's 4.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
31.93%
Positive EBIT growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
31.93%
Positive operating income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
29.71%
Net income growth under 50% of KGC's 339.34%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
22.22%
EPS growth under 50% of KGC's 328.57%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of KGC's 328.57%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.39%
Slight or no buybacks while KGC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.49%
Slight or no buyback while KGC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.93%
Positive OCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
26.93%
Positive FCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
196.70%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
135.29%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
137.47%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2148.09%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 9.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
271.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2063.83%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 257.98%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
193.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 83.36%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1201.26%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 140.32%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
144.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 124.00%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.70%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. KGC's 132.20%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.67%
Asset growth well under 50% of KGC's 7.86%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.54%
Under 50% of KGC's 10.84%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.49%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 14.23%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.77%
SG&A growth well above KGC's 37.04%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.