95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.20%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of KGC's 12.28%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
-7.24%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 11.32%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
46.83%
EBIT growth above 1.5x KGC's 9.89%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
46.83%
Operating income growth above 1.5x KGC's 9.89%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
22.02%
Positive net income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.67%
Positive EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.24%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 2.12%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
10.44%
Diluted share count expanding well above KGC's 1.76%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.42%
OCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 3.87%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
27.48%
Positive FCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
75.71%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 18.51%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.46%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC stands at 17.82%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
936.18%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 236.87%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-41.26%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
657.46%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-46.67%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2332.51%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 47.96%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
60.11%
Below 50% of KGC's 132.13%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
220.52%
AR growth well above KGC's 39.09%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.22%
Asset growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.86%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.70%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.54%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.31%
We cut SG&A while KGC invests at 7.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.