PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.09%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-4.91%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
1.34%
Positive EBIT growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1.34%
Positive operating income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-12.16%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.85%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-17.03%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
213.02%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 69.35%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
160.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 81.24%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
25.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 64.54%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
445.64%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 292.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
24.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 44.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.17%
Below 50% of KGC's 10082.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
15.46%
Below 50% of KGC's 62.71%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
443.23%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 118.87%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
64.29%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.90%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. KGC's 86.25%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.18%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.12%
1.25-1.5x KGC's 2.48%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
270.10%
We have some new debt while KGC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.61%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.