95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.12%
Revenue growth above 1.5x KGC's 5.42%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
25.66%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x KGC's 6.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
24.79%
EBIT growth above 1.5x KGC's 5.54%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
24.79%
Operating income growth above 1.5x KGC's 5.54%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
21.19%
Positive net income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
20.00%
EPS growth of 20.00% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
23.53%
Diluted EPS growth of 23.53% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
0.10%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.16%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 0.18%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-0.07%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
32.30%
OCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 7.82%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
35.01%
Positive FCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
145787334.37%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 23.50%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
152.10%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 19.01%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
148.31%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 79.06%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
47649.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 138.32%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
215.19%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 15.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
197.01%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 592.78%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
55639.64%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 464.49% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
261.20%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 14.64%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
302.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of KGC's 415.23%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
153.14%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 292.40%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
92.18%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 66.53%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.48%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.82%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.14%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-7.14%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 59.43%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.32%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.