95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
78.11%
Revenue growth above 1.5x KGC's 6.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
56.56%
Positive gross profit growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
56.27%
Positive EBIT growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
56.27%
Positive operating income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
48.49%
Positive net income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
47.06%
Positive EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
47.06%
Positive diluted EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.14%
Slight or no buybacks while KGC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.13%
Slight or no buyback while KGC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-30.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
97.45%
OCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 30.21%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
149.53%
FCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 55.45%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
747.55%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 55.56%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
260.22%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 109.60%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
206.39%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 3.74%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
10355.24%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 244.83%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
365.07%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 216.06%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
245.68%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
9636.81%
Positive 10Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
349.98%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
237.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3155.98%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 143.15%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
150.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 1.18%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
74.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 8.25%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.01%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while KGC stands at 11.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.69%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.28%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-12.48%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.61%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.