PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-28.37%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-23.08%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 112.53%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-19.72%
Negative EBIT growth while KGC is at 107.96%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-19.72%
Negative operating income growth while KGC is at 107.96%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-24.94%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 105.37%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-24.00%
Negative EPS growth while KGC is at 105.34%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-26.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while KGC is at 105.34%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-34.81%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-787.15%
Negative FCF growth while KGC is at 226.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
565.78%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 95.50%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
164.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 72.44%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
131.26%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
89499.57%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 318.22%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
215.34%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 152.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
177.71%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 3.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
7607.09%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 396.79% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
200.94%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 21.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
188.75%
Positive short-term CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3166.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 28.31%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
149.57%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 10.06%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
75.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 6.67%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.73%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.97%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.82%
BV/share growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.74%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
2077.39%
We have some new debt while KGC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.73%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.