95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.29%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-0.43%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 109.38%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.43%
Negative EBIT growth while KGC is at 104.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.43%
Negative operating income growth while KGC is at 104.46%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
8.35%
Net income growth under 50% of KGC's 101.31%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth under 50% of KGC's 101.42%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of KGC's 101.42%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.26%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.09%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.21%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 0.67%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-61.46%
Dividend reduction while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-5.26%
Negative OCF growth while KGC is at 24.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
29250.87%
FCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 20.91%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
369.06%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 59.69%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
194.35%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
73.48%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1883.30%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
271.01%
Positive OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
62.94%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1508.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 294.40% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
165.13%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
7.72%
Positive short-term CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3689.21%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 9.35%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
157.40%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
62.48%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.62%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. KGC's 2593.28%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.94%
BV/share growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.96%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-9.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
We cut SG&A while KGC invests at 0.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.