Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Revenue growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.09%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Positive net income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Slight or no buybacks while KGC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.

Slight or no buyback while KGC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.

10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 75.18%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.

5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 4.85%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.

Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 401.71%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.

Positive OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.

Positive 10Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 55.68%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We cut SG&A while KGC invests at 22.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.