PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.36%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-25.34%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-25.34%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-25.34%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
1057.27%
Positive net income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1300.00%
Positive EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1300.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
3.48%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.44%
Diluted share count expanding well above KGC's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-8.03%
Dividend reduction while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-21.81%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-15.44%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
299.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 38.84%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
43.11%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-30.25%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
511.56%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
22.41%
Positive OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-45.18%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
269.19%
Positive 10Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-5.47%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-65.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC is 55.90%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
583.10%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 10.92%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
94.31%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
30.33%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.88%
Negative near-term dividend growth while KGC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
98.06%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.64%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-2.60%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.03%
Debt growth far above KGC's 0.05%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.99%
SG&A declining or stable vs. KGC's 34.03%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.