PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.84%
Positive revenue growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-5.28%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 102.99%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.35%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.35%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-86.91%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-86.84%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-86.84%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.19%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.01%
Slight or no buyback while KGC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
17.11%
Dividend growth of 17.11% while KGC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
8.12%
OCF growth at 50-75% of KGC's 13.67%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
127.02%
Positive FCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
196.24%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 13.63%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
7.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
24.99%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
192.99%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-14.53%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
13.51%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 50.71%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-77.12%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-93.99%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while KGC is 96.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-90.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC is 85.65%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
285.20%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
49.04%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
18.79%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.97%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-42.97%
Negative near-term dividend growth while KGC invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-20.14%
Firm’s AR is declining while KGC shows 120.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.73%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.66%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-11.30%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.99%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.