PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-23.42%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-18.86%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-23.52%
Negative EBIT growth while KGC is at 236.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-23.52%
Negative operating income growth while KGC is at 236.52%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
463.45%
Net income growth above 1.5x KGC's 215.54%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
460.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x KGC's 217.52%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
460.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x KGC's 217.52%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-31.36%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-31.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
124.38%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 11.37%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-20.60%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-3.10%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
100.65%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-41.38%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-15.46%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
22.82%
Positive 10Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-66.69%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while KGC is 16.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-37.90%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC is 317.57%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
256.57%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
44.22%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
17.38%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.26%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.10%
Negative asset growth while KGC invests at 0.31%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.73%
Under 50% of KGC's 3.59%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-10.81%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.57%
SG&A growth well above KGC's 6.34%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.