PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.68%
Positive revenue growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.02%
Positive gross profit growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.37%
Positive EBIT growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
0.37%
Positive operating income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-1.53%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 81.57%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.07%
Share change of 0.07% while KGC is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.02%
Slight or no buyback while KGC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-29.69%
Dividend reduction while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
3.56%
OCF growth under 50% of KGC's 10.02%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
3.57%
FCF growth under 50% of KGC's 66.67%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
157.92%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 42.60%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
0.79%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-0.77%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
139.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 15.93%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-19.65%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-13.05%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
74.58%
Positive 10Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-55.47%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
1100.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to KGC's 1181.57%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
235.48%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
36.34%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
14.09%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.06%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
65.81%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 65.81% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
56.16%
AR growth well above KGC's 7.32%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while KGC stands at 7.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.01%
Negative asset growth while KGC invests at 0.68%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.66%
50-75% of KGC's 1.27%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-10.39%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.14%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.