PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.60%
Positive revenue growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
2.05%
Positive gross profit growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.39%
Positive EBIT growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.39%
Positive operating income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
367.01%
Positive net income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
380.00%
Positive EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
380.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.10%
Share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 0.22%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.13%
Diluted share count expanding well above KGC's 0.08%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.87%
Positive OCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-483.01%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
115.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 27.63%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
1.89%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
17.79%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
90.20%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 328.61%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-13.59%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC is at 62.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
12.80%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 1.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
590.04%
Positive 10Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
258.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 100.07%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
439.98%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 102.64%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
227.59%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
30.26%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
6.84%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.93%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
71.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 71.00% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
453.10%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. KGC's 1227.66%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.26%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.16%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
44.27%
Debt growth far above KGC's 0.03%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.