PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.83%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 4.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
12.55%
Gross profit growth under 50% of KGC's 94.74%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-10.38%
Negative EBIT growth while KGC is at 151.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-10.38%
Negative operating income growth while KGC is at 151.43%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-79.93%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 73.47%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-81.25%
Negative EPS growth while KGC is at 72.10%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-81.25%
Negative diluted EPS growth while KGC is at 73.41%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.17%
Slight or no buybacks while KGC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.23%
Diluted share count expanding well above KGC's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
1.54%
Dividend growth of 1.54% while KGC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
0.04%
OCF growth under 50% of KGC's 44.26%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
126.84%
FCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 40.01%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
222.40%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-5.56%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-11.09%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC stands at 6.47%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
210.51%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-29.99%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-26.27%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
108.33%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 98.42%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
-94.15%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while KGC is 96.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
103.66%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to KGC's 96.85%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
254.23%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
23.55%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
12.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 10.77%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.85%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
77.66%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 77.66% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
118.02%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.76%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.46%
We have a declining book value while KGC shows 3.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-8.44%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.46%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.