PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.81%
Negative revenue growth while KGC stands at 6.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-23.27%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 10.17%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-256.60%
Negative EBIT growth while KGC is at 25.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-256.60%
Negative operating income growth while KGC is at 25.04%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-317.43%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 10.51%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-315.38%
Negative EPS growth while KGC is at 20.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-315.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while KGC is at 20.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.31%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.14%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.30%
Diluted share count expanding well above KGC's 0.17%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.56%
Negative OCF growth while KGC is at 32.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-8.06%
Negative FCF growth while KGC is at 526.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
205.89%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
2.32%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-12.59%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
176.09%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 7.53%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-14.51%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC is at 87.96%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-20.28%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC stands at 4.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-552.06%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while KGC is at 105.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-257.57%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while KGC is 48.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-302.57%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC is 384.15%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
161.66%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
17.18%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
3.49%
Below 50% of KGC's 9.33%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.77%
Dividend/share CAGR of 13.77% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
69.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 69.37% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-27.48%
Firm’s AR is declining while KGC shows 236.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-3.67%
Negative asset growth while KGC invests at 2.31%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.48%
We have a declining book value while KGC shows 2.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-7.41%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 0.95%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.45%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.