PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.01%
Revenue growth above 1.5x KGC's 4.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
42.43%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x KGC's 11.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
173.43%
EBIT growth above 1.5x KGC's 12.68%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
173.43%
Operating income growth above 1.5x KGC's 12.68%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
160.92%
Positive net income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
160.71%
Positive EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
160.71%
Positive diluted EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.23%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.31%
Diluted share count expanding well above KGC's 0.21%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-48.78%
Dividend reduction while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
30.24%
Positive OCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
30.44%
Positive FCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
124.83%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
8.13%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-5.44%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
119.98%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-5.19%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-13.15%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
58.76%
Below 50% of KGC's 257.14%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
1255.10%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to KGC's 1190.89%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
-9.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC is 2320.64%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
121.53%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
15.88%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
3.35%
Below 50% of KGC's 10.41%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.92%
Dividend/share CAGR of 45.92% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
66.54%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.54% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
156.25%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.29%
Asset growth at 50-75% of KGC's 0.44%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
1.52%
1.25-1.5x KGC's 1.36%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-7.47%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.56%
SG&A growth well above KGC's 9.12%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.