PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.17%
Negative revenue growth while KGC stands at 13.58%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
0.25%
Gross profit growth under 50% of KGC's 149.27%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
3.15%
EBIT growth below 50% of KGC's 249.82%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.15%
Operating income growth under 50% of KGC's 249.82%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
2.06%
Net income growth under 50% of KGC's 756.32%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.22%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.06%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.23%
Diluted share count expanding well above KGC's 0.03%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
3.61%
Dividend growth of 3.61% while KGC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-7.33%
Negative OCF growth while KGC is at 76.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-7.91%
Negative FCF growth while KGC is at 426.63%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
88.45%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
31.69%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 14.95%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-14.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC stands at 9.60%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
42.03%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
16.03%
Below 50% of KGC's 111.62%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-25.58%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC stands at 34.11%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
16.64%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 22.90%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
23.39%
Below 50% of KGC's 138.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
603.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 544.60%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
136.18%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
21.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 0.27%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
6.29%
Below 50% of KGC's 27.43%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.38%
Dividend/share CAGR of 64.38% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
47.34%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 47.34% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
17.16%
AR growth well above KGC's 25.45%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.31%
Asset growth well under 50% of KGC's 7.48%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.16%
Under 50% of KGC's 11.36%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-13.66%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.41%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.