PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.14%
Positive revenue growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
28.42%
Positive gross profit growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
30.60%
Positive EBIT growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
30.60%
Positive operating income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
22.41%
Positive net income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.53%
Positive EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.53%
Positive diluted EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
34.67%
Positive OCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
35.67%
Positive FCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
126.65%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
61.68%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 2.77%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
26.90%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 9.72%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
135.70%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
65.00%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 9.34%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
45.99%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to KGC's 43.14%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
62.55%
Positive 10Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
59.02%
Below 50% of KGC's 1771.51%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
52.81%
Positive short-term CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
125.25%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-2.02%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while KGC is at 1.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
3.78%
Below 50% of KGC's 23.25%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.93%
Firm’s AR is declining while KGC shows 23.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-3.20%
Negative asset growth while KGC invests at 8.27%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.65%
We have a declining book value while KGC shows 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-18.14%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 35.26%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.92%
We cut SG&A while KGC invests at 1.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.