PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.68%
Negative revenue growth while KGC stands at 14.48%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
0.85%
Gross profit growth under 50% of KGC's 56.97%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-6.90%
Negative EBIT growth while KGC is at 66.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.90%
Negative operating income growth while KGC is at 66.72%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
11.50%
Net income growth under 50% of KGC's 59.49%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
14.29%
EPS growth under 50% of KGC's 60.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of KGC's 50.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.19%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.24%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.26%
Diluted share count expanding well above KGC's 0.25%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.53%
Negative OCF growth while KGC is at 44.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-14.16%
Negative FCF growth while KGC is at 149.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
99.48%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
35.84%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 21.55%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
22.28%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 14.98%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
73.19%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 11.13%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
25.11%
Below 50% of KGC's 135.92%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
19.89%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 138.82%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
51.85%
Positive 10Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
77.41%
Below 50% of KGC's 314.38%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
54.11%
Below 50% of KGC's 486.26%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
123.94%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
9.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 7.07%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
6.03%
Below 50% of KGC's 28.54%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
117.08%
Dividend/share CAGR of 117.08% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
56.86%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.86% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
94433.33%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
Asset growth well under 50% of KGC's 5.48%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.22%
50-75% of KGC's 4.79%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-10.44%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 7.12%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.81%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.