PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.85%
Negative revenue growth while KGC stands at 5.64%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-8.30%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 131.41%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1.75%
Negative EBIT growth while KGC is at 152.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.75%
Negative operating income growth while KGC is at 152.24%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
4.90%
Net income growth under 50% of KGC's 225.43%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
6.06%
EPS growth under 50% of KGC's 231.58%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
6.06%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of KGC's 226.32%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.09%
Share change of 0.09% while KGC is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-0.31%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
25.60%
Dividend growth of 25.60% while KGC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-8.83%
Negative OCF growth while KGC is at 25.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-8.64%
Negative FCF growth while KGC is at 19.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
50.22%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 17.17%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
27.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 53.09%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
16.22%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 46.18%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
30.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 129.08%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
39.76%
Below 50% of KGC's 238.17%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
24.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 84.23%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
0.37%
Below 50% of KGC's 236.11%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
183.27%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to KGC's 184.17%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
212.45%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of KGC's 256.77%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
98.34%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
23.42%
Below 50% of KGC's 53.43%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
14.87%
Below 50% of KGC's 42.63%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
139.09%
Dividend/share CAGR of 139.09% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
39.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 39.29% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-3.56%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
238799900.00%
Inventory growth well above KGC's 3.96%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.20%
Negative asset growth while KGC invests at 9.24%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.85%
Under 50% of KGC's 13.32%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-59.56%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.96%
We cut SG&A while KGC invests at 42.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.