PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.94%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 1.46%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
3.70%
Positive gross profit growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-0.01%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.01%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
2.54%
Positive net income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2.78%
Positive EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2.78%
Positive diluted EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.13%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.17%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.13%
Diluted share count expanding well above KGC's 0.14%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.78%
Negative OCF growth while KGC is at 38.74%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
97.38%
FCF growth under 50% of KGC's 238.49%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
33.15%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
50.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 12.66%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
53.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 28.01%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
0.93%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
56.40%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 21.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
57.62%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 108.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
-11.94%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
167.29%
Below 50% of KGC's 570.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-48.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC is 4827.12%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
90.57%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
19.17%
Below 50% of KGC's 57.52%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
11.80%
Below 50% of KGC's 46.51%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
666.81%
Dividend/share CAGR of 666.81% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
173.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 173.48% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
57.86%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 57.86% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
139.98%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-1.95%
Inventory is declining while KGC stands at 4.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.89%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.93%
1.25-1.5x KGC's 1.54%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-4.69%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.08%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.