PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-18.59%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-16.62%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-15.52%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-15.52%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-18.77%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-18.92%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.92%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.05%
Slight or no buybacks while KGC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.11%
Slight or no buyback while KGC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-44.76%
Dividend reduction while KGC stands at 4.69%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-6.99%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
31.55%
Positive FCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
13.95%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
12.85%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
42.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 19.03%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-5.57%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
21.90%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 5.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
82.91%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 120.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
-21.60%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
59.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
290.73%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 55.26%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
86.13%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
18.37%
Below 50% of KGC's 61.36%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
14.03%
Below 50% of KGC's 52.57%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
323.53%
Stable or rising dividend while KGC is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
190.02%
Dividend/share CAGR of 190.02% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
66.46%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.46% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-24.73%
Firm’s AR is declining while KGC shows 238.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
280.32%
Inventory growth well above KGC's 0.46%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.09%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.97%
Under 50% of KGC's 2.85%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-7.67%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.65%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.