Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Revenue growth above 1.5x KGC's 1.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Positive EBIT growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Net income growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 93.99%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.

EPS growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 94.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.

Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 94.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Maintaining or increasing dividends while KGC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 6.12%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.

Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.

Positive OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 2.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 97.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 90.75%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.

Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

Dividend/share CAGR of 41.31% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 147.79% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 64.03% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

We show growth while KGC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.

Asset growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.16%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.

Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 14.74%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.