PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.44%
Positive revenue growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
19.36%
Gross profit growth under 50% of KGC's 59.82%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
12.09%
EBIT growth below 50% of KGC's 325.27%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
12.09%
Operating income growth under 50% of KGC's 325.27%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-46.04%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-46.15%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-46.15%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.13%
Share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 0.79%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 1.36%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while KGC stands at 2.64%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
7.81%
Positive OCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
251.29%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 178.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
20.66%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
51.97%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
34.55%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
0.77%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
71.89%
Positive OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
75.55%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-16.12%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
151.82%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
170.60%
Positive short-term CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
80.17%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
24.93%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 45.92%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
19.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 37.19%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
118.73%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-15.06%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.76%
Asset growth well under 50% of KGC's 6.65%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.46%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.09%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 65.01%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.24%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.