PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.41%
Negative revenue growth while KGC stands at 6.97%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-9.76%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 7.70%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-6.19%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.19%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-5.33%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 92.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-5.71%
Negative EPS growth while KGC is at 92.44%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-5.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth while KGC is at 92.44%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.14%
Share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 2.75%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 1.63%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.99%
Negative OCF growth while KGC is at 5.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
15.97%
Positive FCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
17.83%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
48.43%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
57.84%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-6.51%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC stands at 132.29%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
61.94%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 11.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
86.47%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-17.41%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
115.73%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
218.03%
Positive short-term CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
76.72%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
24.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 38.84%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
23.93%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of KGC's 28.30%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
44.13%
Dividend/share CAGR of 44.13% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
119.91%
Dividend/share CAGR of 119.91% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
82.04%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 82.04% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-46.31%
Firm’s AR is declining while KGC shows 2606.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
61.49%
Inventory growth well above KGC's 0.90%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.33%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.92%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-9.45%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.46%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.