PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.14%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-3.04%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 547.32%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1.06%
Negative EBIT growth while KGC is at 304.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.06%
Negative operating income growth while KGC is at 304.40%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-32.95%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 185.09%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-32.43%
Negative EPS growth while KGC is at 184.79%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-32.43%
Negative diluted EPS growth while KGC is at 183.99%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 0.25%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 1.25%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-21.46%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-60.38%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-18.34%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
5.34%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to KGC's 5.48%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
-16.68%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC stands at 8.18%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-36.08%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
5.49%
Positive OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-24.69%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-34.59%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
60.03%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
16.20%
Positive short-term CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
65.46%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
35.36%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 28.46%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
28.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 12.98%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.98%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-37.75%
Inventory is declining while KGC stands at 6.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.15%
Asset growth above 1.5x KGC's 1.00%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.34%
1.25-1.5x KGC's 1.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-10.20%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 3.91%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.88%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.