PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.79%
Negative revenue growth while KGC stands at 0.92%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-16.44%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-17.01%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-17.01%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-17.73%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-21.88%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-21.88%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.02%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.01%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-50.24%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-15.45%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-32.66%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
5.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 17.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
17.64%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 48.92%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-28.00%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
13.22%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 193.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
54.57%
Below 50% of KGC's 225.69%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-25.62%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
18.59%
Below 50% of KGC's 143.70%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
235.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 207.01%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
-23.01%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
61.85%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
29.21%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of KGC's 35.47%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
22.22%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 6.67%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
46.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 46.20% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
91.79%
Dividend/share CAGR of 91.79% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
76.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.29% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
57.36%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-50.99%
Inventory is declining while KGC stands at 1.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.02%
Asset growth well under 50% of KGC's 0.44%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.06%
We have a declining book value while KGC shows 1.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-4.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.84%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.