95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.09%
Revenue growth under 50% of KGC's 18.39%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.25%
Gross profit growth under 50% of KGC's 83.65%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
4.11%
EBIT growth below 50% of KGC's 90.21%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
4.11%
Operating income growth under 50% of KGC's 90.21%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
26.42%
Net income growth under 50% of KGC's 69.82%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
25.93%
EPS growth under 50% of KGC's 70.59%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
25.93%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of KGC's 70.59%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.05%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.04%
Diluted share count expanding well above KGC's 0.03%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-49.72%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
8.76%
OCF growth at 50-75% of KGC's 15.50%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
20.73%
FCF growth 50-75% of KGC's 34.96%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
46.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 42.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
35.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 67.76%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
13.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 63.64%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
66.91%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 112.69%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
76.04%
Below 50% of KGC's 204.45%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
25.43%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 150.70%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
2617.04%
Below 50% of KGC's 6639.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
100.51%
Below 50% of KGC's 499.48%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
13.76%
Below 50% of KGC's 879.92%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
59.30%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 1.59%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
37.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of KGC's 42.15%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
20.03%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
208.45%
Dividend/share CAGR of 208.45% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
111.38%
Dividend/share CAGR of 111.38% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
21.38%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while KGC cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
35.90%
AR growth well above KGC's 1.04%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above KGC's 7.56%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.90%
Asset growth above 1.5x KGC's 1.14%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.34%
Under 50% of KGC's 5.37%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-1.26%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.27%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.