95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.62%
Revenue growth above 1.5x KGC's 5.77%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
0.89%
Positive gross profit growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
136.68%
EBIT growth above 1.5x KGC's 11.79%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
147.14%
Operating income growth above 1.5x KGC's 13.83%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
188.14%
Net income growth above 1.5x KGC's 33.53%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
194.74%
EPS growth above 1.5x KGC's 36.36%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
194.74%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x KGC's 36.36%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 0.04%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 0.43%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
194.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 4.43%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
82.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 73.68%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
52.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 119.73%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.09%
Below 50% of KGC's 3092.95%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
164.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of KGC's 206.03%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
60.31%
Below 50% of KGC's 172.25%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.42%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.