PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.48%
Negative revenue growth while NEM stands at 14.34%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-14.48%
Negative gross profit growth while NEM is at 21.54%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
219.35%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
219.35%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
311.06%
Positive net income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
975.86%
Positive EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
975.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
835.87%
OCF growth above 1.5x NEM's 96.89%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
835.87%
FCF growth above 1.5x NEM's 294.47%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
7.47%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
7.47%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
7.47%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.39%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while NEM stands at 329.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-24.39%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while NEM is at 32.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-24.39%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while NEM is at 61.10%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.57%
Our AR growth while NEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-6.58%
Inventory is declining while NEM stands at 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.06%
Positive asset growth while NEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.07%
Positive BV/share change while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-148.44%
We cut SG&A while NEM invests at 7.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.